Using Assistive Technology to Improve Decoding Skills in Special Educational Needs (SEN) Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56663/rop.v11i1.40Keywords:
assistive technology, reading skills, intellectual disability, special educational needsAbstract
While text-to-speech and other related read-aloud tools have been used before to foster reading comprehension skills in Special Educational Needs (SEN) students, they have been mainly used to translate written text into spoken text, thus enabling poor readers to follow along. This study examines the impact of using such tools to design an adaptive learning curriculum that aims to improve decoding skills by integrating high-frequency words into technology-enhanced phonics lessons. Results suggest this technique is effective in facilitating a better understanding of high-frequency word structure in students with learning disabilities, but less so in strengthening their ability to decode nonsense words.
References
Aaron, P. G., Joshi, M., & Williams, K. A. (1999). Not All Reading Disabilities Are Alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949903200203
Chambrè, S. J., Ehri, L. C., & Ness, M. (2020). Phonological decoding enhances orthographic facilitation of vocabulary learning in first graders. Reading and Writing, 33(5), 1133–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09997-w
Coltheart, M. (2005). Modeling Reading: The Dual-Route Approach. In The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 6–23). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch1
Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356980140202
Foster, Michael, "The Effectiveness of High Frequency Word List Instruction on Star Reading Test Scores" (2017). Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 1631. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1631
Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Theurel, A. (2015). Differences in the Predictors of Reading Comprehension in First Graders from Low Socio-Economic Status Families with Either Good or Poor Decoding Skills. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0119581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119581
Hickey, T. M. (2007). Fluency in Reading Irish as L1 or L2: Promoting High-frequency Word Recognition in Emergent Readers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(4), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb455.0
Lee, J. F. (1987). A Developmental Hierarchy of Syllabic Difficulty. Hispania, 70(2), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.2307/343377
Moran, J., Ferdig, R. E., Pearson, P. D., Wardrop, J., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2008). Technology and Reading Performance in the Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis with Recommendations for Policy and Practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(1), 6–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802070483
Müller, B., Richter, T., & Karageorgos, P. (2020). Syllable-based reading improvement: Effects on word reading and reading comprehension in Grade 2. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101304
Nordström, T., Nilsson, S., Gustafson, S., & Svensson, I. (2019). Assistive technology applications for students with reading difficulties: Special education teachers’ experiences and perceptions. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(8), 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1499142
Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Defior, S., & Simpson, I. (2017). Visual multi-element processing as a pre-reading predictor of decoding skill. Journal of Memory and Language, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.003
Perelmutter, B., McGregor, K. K., & Gordon, K. R. (2017). Assistive Technology Interventions for Adolescents and Adults with Learning Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005
Pinna, B., & Deiana, K. (2018). On the Role of Color in Reading and Comprehension Tasks in Dyslexic Children and Adults. I-Perception, 9(3), 2041669518779098. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518779098
Sermier Dessemontet, R., Martinet, C., de Chambrier, A.-F., Martini-Willemin, B.-M., & Audrin, C. (2019). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of phonics instruction for teaching decoding skills to students with intellectual disability. Educational Research Review, 26, 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.001
Stetter, M. E. (2018). The Use of Technology to Assist School-Aged Students with High Incidence Special Needs in Reading. Education Sciences, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020061
Swanson, H. L., Xinhua Zheng, null, & Jerman, O. (2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 260–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409331958
Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does Use of Text-to-Speech and Related Read-Aloud Tools Improve Reading Comprehension for Students with Reading Disabilities? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416688170
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Review of Psychopedagogy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.