The inclusive university - a desideratum and part of the state of normality

Authors

  • Nina Cebotaru The State University of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Republic of Moldova, University Lecturer, PhD.
  • Serghei Racu The State University of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Republic of Moldova, Associate Professor, PhD.
  • Ala Pogorlețchi The State University of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Republic of Moldova, Associate Professor, PhD.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56663/rop.v11i1.47

Keywords:

education, normality, disability, inclusion, students, university, models.

Abstract

This investigative approach starts from our concerns and from the desire to clarify theoretical and practical aspects regarding certain attitudes and behaviors observed at the community level such as segregation, isolation, and, sometimes, even rejection of certain groups and social categories that we call "at risk" or "disadvantaged". This is why we advocate in this article for an inclusive university. The key principles of inclusion consider fundamental concepts such as: valuing diversity, the right to be respected, the dignity of the human being, individual needs understood as individual requirements, planning, collective responsibility, the development of relationships and professional culture, professional development, and equal opportunities. In the field of education, inclusion requires universities and the entire educational system to change and adapt to the needs of the student. Inclusive education must be seen as a permanent process of improving the higher education institution, with the aim of exploiting existing resources, especially human resources, to support the participation in the educational process of all people within a community.

References

Nirje B. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In R. Kugel & W. Wolensberger (coord.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 181-195). Washington DC: President’s Committee on Mental Retardation.

Danby, J., Cullen, C. (1988). Integration and Mainstreaming: a review of the efficacy of mainstreaming and integration for mentally handicapped pupils. Educational Psychology, 8(3), 177-195.

Racu A., Popovici D. V., Bucinschi C., Racu S. (2007). Social assistance for people with disabilities. Chişinău, Ed. Pontos.

М.И. Губанова (2010). Педагогическое взаимодействие: учебное пособие, 96 p.

М.И. Рожков (2011). Конспекты уроков для учителя 5–9 классов общеобразовательных учреждений. Воспитание гражданина: уроки социальности, 90 p.

Racu A., Verza Fl., Racu S. (2012). Special Pedagogy. Î.S. F.E.-P „Tipografia Centrală”, Chişinău.

Racu, A., Racu S. (2013). Encyclopaedia dictionary of special psychopedagogy, ISFE-P. Chişinău: Tipografia Centrală

Cebotaru N., Racu S. (2020). Inclusive school environment and mechanisms for the emergence of segregation barriers in school. In: Sport and Society: Interdisciplinary Journal of Physical Education and Sports. Volumul 20, nr.1, Iași. https://www.sportsisocietate.ro/articol/492

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-International-Classification-of-Functioning-Disability-and-Health-ICF-model

Downloads

Published

14-12-2022

How to Cite

Cebotaru, N., Racu, S., & Pogorlețchi , A. (2022). The inclusive university - a desideratum and part of the state of normality. Review of Psychopedagogy, 11(1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.56663/rop.v11i1.47