The effects of a therapeutic program based on motor learning in the recovery of apraxia of speech in children

Dana Elena Ciobanu

doi:10.56663/rop.v12i1.58

Authors

Dana Elena Ciobanu University of Bucharest Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56663/rop.v12i1.58

Keywords:

childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), therapy programs, Speech Skills, verbal motor learning

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to analyze comparatively the effects of some therapeutic interventions to improve the symptoms of apraxia of speech in children (CAS). In this sense, three different therapeutic programs were implemented, each lasting 12 months, in three groups of children. Two measurements were made, before and after the children's participation in the programs. P1 included therapy based on augmentative and alternative communication, P2 included therapy based on the classic speech therapy model and therapeutic speech massage, P3 included therapy based on verbal motor learning, VML. 106 children diagnosed with CAS participated in the study, aged between 5 and 7 years, M = 5.75, SD = .75, of which 81 boys (76%) and 25 girls (24%), were randomly divided into three groups. CAS severity was measured using a grid from the Dynamic Assessment of Motor Speech Skills, measuring articulatory accuracy, vowel scoring, and prosody. Visuomotor accuracy, visuospatial processing, phonemic hearing, narrative memory, and attention were measured with a series of tests from the PEDb and PEDa packages (Cognitrom, 2012). Although all three therapeutic programs registered significant effects on the improvement of CAS symptomatology, the most notable effects were obtained by the VML method. The practical implications of the study are discussed, as well as future research directions.

References

Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., McCabe, P., & McDonald, J. (2010). A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1227–1245. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0130)

Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and alternative communication, 23(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600807470

Branson , D. , & Demchak , M . (2009) . The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 274 – 286. doi:10.3109/07434610903384529

Clark, H. M. (2003). Neuromuscular treatments for speech and swallowing: A tutorial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 400–415.

Dyakova, E. A. (2005). Main Principles for the Application of Therapeutic Speech Massage in the seech therapy practice. The Speech Therapist in Pre – school. Academia Press, 5-6, 102-112.

Dyakova, E. A. (2006). Main Principles for the Application of Therapeutic Speech Massage in the Prevention and Treatment of Speech Disturbances. Public Health and prevention of diseases. Academia Press, 2, 53-58.

Dyakova, E. A. (2012). Therapeutic Speech Massage: A Manual for Practitioners and Students. Academia Press.

Freedman, S. E., Maas, E., Caligiuri, M. P., Wulf, G., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Internal versus external: Oral-motor performance as a function of attentional focus. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 131-136. Gomez, M., McCabe, P., & Purcell, A. (2019). Clinical management of childhood apraxia of speech: A survey of speech-language pathologists in Australia and New Zealand. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–10. doi:10.1080/17549507.2019.1608301

Groenen, P., Maassen, B., Crul, T., & Thoonen, G. (1996). The specific relation between perception and production errors for place of articulation in developmental apraxia of speech. Journal of speech and hearing research, 39(3), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3903.468

Hodson, B. W., Paden, E. P. (1991). A phonological approach to remediation: Targeting intelligible speech (2nd ed.).TX.

Jaric, S., Corcos, D. M., Agarwal, G. C., & Gottlieb, G. L. (1993). Principles for learning single-joint movements. II. Generalizing a learned behavior. Experimental Brain Research, 94, 514-521.

Maas, E., Gildersleeve-Neumann, C., Jakielski, K. J., & Stoeckel, R. (2014). Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Current developmental disorders reports, 1(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-014-0016-4

Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025)

Magill, R. A. (2007). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Miclea, M., Bălaj, A. (2012). Platforma de Evaluare a Dezvoltării. Evaluarea aptitudinilor cognitive. ASCR.

Morgan, A., T., Haaften, L., V., van Hulst, K., Edley, C., Mei, C., Tan, T., Y., Amor, D., Fisher, S., E., & Koolen, D. A. (2018). Early speech development in Koolen de Vries syndrome limited by oral praxis and hypotonia. European journal of human genetics:EJHG, 26(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-017-0035-9

Nijland, L., Maassen, B., Van der Meulen, S., Gabreels, F., Kraaimaat, F. W., & Schreuder, R. (2002). Coarticulation patterns in children with developmental apraxia of speech. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 16(6), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200210159103

Rochet-Capellan, A., Richer, L., Ostry, D. J. (2012). Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 1711–1717.

Rvachew, S., & Bernhardt, B. M. (2010). Clinical implications of dynamic systems theory for phonological development. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 34-50.

Strand, E. A., McCauley, R. J., Weigand, S. D., Stoeckel, R. E., & Baas, B. S. (2013). A motor speech assessment for children with severe speech disorders: reliability and validity evidence. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 56(2), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0094)

Van der Merwe, A. (2009). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (2nd ed.). Thieme.

Vashdi, E. (2013). Using VML (verbal motor learning) method techniques in treatment of prosody disorder due to childhood apraxia of speech: A case study. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 6(2), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.3Sup1/126

Vashdi, E. (2014). The influence of Initial Phoneme Cue technique according to the VML method on word formation with a child who has apraxia of speech and autism - A case study. International Journal Child Health Human Development, 7(2), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.3Sup1/122

Vihman, M. M. (2004). Early phonological development. In J. E. Bernthal & N. W. Bankson (Eds.), Articulation and phonological disorders (pp 63-85). Pearson.

Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(11), 487-494.

Wulf, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(4), 648-660.